Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
34193
Randall Richard Potts v. Her Majesty the Queen
(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
2012-07-23 | Appeal closed | |
2012-07-23 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties | |
2012-07-23 | Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties | |
2012-07-20 |
Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ De F Ro Cro Mo Ka, The appeals from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Numbers CA037699 and CA037698, 2011 BCCA 55, dated February 10, 2011, heard on March 21, 2012, are dismissed. Dismissed |
|
2012-04-05 | Transcript received, (57 pages) | |
2012-03-21 | Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow | |
2012-03-21 | Respondent's condensed book, (14 copies submitted at the hearing) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2012-03-21 | Appellant's condensed book, (joint with 34135) 14 copies submitted at the hearing | Randall Richard Potts |
2012-03-21 | Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, from all parties | |
2012-03-21 |
Hearing of the appeal, 2012-03-21, CJ De F Ro Cro Mo Ka Judgment reserved |
|
2012-03-14 | Notice of appearance, Paul Riley and Martha Devlin will be present at the hearing | Her Majesty the Queen |
2012-02-23 | Notice of appearance, Bonnie Craig and Jeffrey Ray will be present at hearing | Randall Richard Potts |
2012-01-16 | Respondent's book of authorities, Joint with 34135 - CD rec'd Jan. 18/12, Completed on: 2012-01-20 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2012-01-16 | Respondent's factum, Joint with 34135 - CD rec'd Jan. 18/12, Completed on: 2012-01-20 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2012-01-03 | Appeal perfected for hearing | |
2011-12-22 | Order on motion for leave to intervene | |
2011-12-22 |
Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, Cro, UPON APPLICATION by the Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario) for leave to intervene in the above appeals; AND THE MATERIAL FILED having been read; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The motion for leave to intervene of the Attorney Criminal Lawyers’ Association (Ontario) is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
2011-12-22 | Submission of motion for leave to intervene, Cro | |
2011-12-09 | Notice of hearing sent to parties | |
2011-12-07 |
Appeal hearing scheduled, 2012-03-21 Judgment reserved |
|
2011-12-06 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, (Letter Form), (Joint with 34135) Fax from W. Paul Riley, dated Dec. 6, 2011, Completed on: 2011-12-06 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2011-11-29 | Response to the motion for leave to intervene, email from Gowlings dated Nov. 29, 2011., Completed on: 2011-11-29 | Randall Richard Potts |
2011-11-28 | Motion for leave to intervene, Joint with 34135, service missing (rec'd Nov. 29, 2011), 1 copy missing (rec'd Nov. 29, 2011), Completed on: 2011-11-29 | Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario) |
2011-11-02 | Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted) | |
2011-11-01 | Appellant's book of authorities, Joint with 34135, Completed on: 2011-11-01 | Randall Richard Potts |
2011-11-01 | Appellant's factum, Completed on: 2011-11-01 | Randall Richard Potts |
2011-08-30 | Appellant's record, (7 volumes) (joint with 34135), Completed on: 2011-08-30 | Randall Richard Potts |
2011-08-08 | Notice of appeal, (AMENDED Notice rec'd Aug. 16/11), Completed on: 2011-08-08 | Randall Richard Potts |
2011-07-04 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
2011-07-04 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
2011-06-30 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA037698, 2011 BCCA 55, dated February 10, 2011, is granted without costs. Granted, without costs |
|
2011-05-30 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ De Cha | |
2011-05-03 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2011-05-03 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2011-04-11 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal | |
2011-04-06 | Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2011-04-06 | Randall Richard Potts |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Potts, Randall Richard | Appellant | Active |
v.
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Potts, Randall Richard
Counsel
Jeffrey Ray
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6B 6B7
Telephone: (604) 685-1355
FAX: (604) 685-1385
Email: bonniecraig@shaw.ca
Agent
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
900 - 840 Howe Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6Z 2S9
Telephone: (604) 666-0704
FAX: (604) 666-1599
Email: paul.riley@sppc-ppsc.gc.ca
Agent
284 Wellington Street
2nd Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 957-4770
FAX: (613) 941-7865
Email: flacasse@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Criminal Law — Trial — Pre trial proceedings — Issue estoppel — Whether trial judge erred in applying balance of probabilities standard of proof to decide whether requirements of issue estoppel were satisfied — Whether Court of Appeal erred in determining that the erroneous application of a legal standard might reasonably have had a material bearing on the acquittal — Whether determining issue estoppel is a question of law or fact.
The applicant was charged with offences under the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The Criminal Code offences were prosecuted before a jury. The jury acquitted the applicant of criminal organization offences that required in part proof that the offences were committed for the benefit of, and at the direction of, the East End Charter of the Hells Angels. The applicant was sentenced in the Criminal Code proceedings on convictions for other offences. A trial of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act charges proceeded and included a charge of instructing the commission of the production and trafficking of methamphetamine for the benefit of, and at the direction of, the East End Charter of the Hells Angels. In a pre trial motion, the trial judge acquitted the applicant of the criminal organization offence because the Crown was estopped from leading evidence to prove that the East End Charter of the Hells Angels was a criminal organization by the verdicts and reasons for sentencing in the Criminal Code proceedings. The applicant pled guilty to the other charges.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of British Columbia
34696
See file
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)
CA037698, 2011 BCCA 55
Appeal allowed, acquittal set aside and new trial ordered.
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available